Skip to main content

Molecular cloning and tissue expression of the fatty acid-binding protein (Es-FABP) gene in female Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis)



Fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs), small cytosolic proteins that function in the uptake and utilization of fatty acids, have been extensively studied in higher vertebrates while invertebrates have received little attention despite similar nutritional requirements during periods of reproductive activity.


Therefore, a cDNA encoding Eriocheir sinensis FABP (Es-FABP) was cloned based upon EST analysis of a hepatopancreas cDNA library. The full length cDNA was 750 bp and encoded a 131 aa polypeptide that was highly homologous to related genes reported in shrimp. The 9108 bp Es-FABP gene contained four exons that were interrupted by three introns, a genomic organization common among FABP multigene family members in vertebrates. Gene expression analysis, as determined by RT-PCR, revealed the presence of Es-FABP transcripts in hepatopancreas, hemocytes, ovary, gills, muscle, thoracic ganglia, heart, and intestine, but not stomach or eyestalk. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed that Es-FABP expression in ovary, hemocytes, and hepatopancreas was dependent on the status of ovarian development, with peak expression observed in January.


Evidence provided in the present report supports a role of Es-FABP in lipid transport during the period of rapid ovarian growth in E. sinensis, and indirectly confirms the participation of the hepatopancreas, ovary, and hemocytes in lipid nutrient absorption and utilization processes.


Fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) are small (14-15 k Da) cytosolic proteins that bind non-covalently to hydrophobic ligands, primarily fatty acids [1]. Physiological roles of FABP include, but are not limited to, the uptake and utilization of fatty acids, intracellular targeting of fatty acids to specific organelles and metabolic pathways, and the protection of cellular structures from the detergent effects of fatty acids [24]. Similarity among FABP deduced amino acid sequences in vertebrates and invertebrates are generally low despite the highly conserved gene structure of four exons and three introns of variable size [5, 6], with the exception of desert locust FABP3 [7] and zebrafish FAPB1a [8]. Tertiary structure is common among all FABP family members, and consists of ten antiparallel β-sheet strands that surround the ligand binding domain [9].

To date, 12 FABP isoforms have been identified in vertebrates [10]. While genes were originally named according to the initial tissue from which they were first isolated, e.g. Liver-type FABP (L-FABP), Intestinal-type FABP (I-FABP), Heart-type FABP (H-FABP), Adipocyte-type FABP (A-FABP), Epidermal-type (E-FABP), isoform expression among multiple tissues and differences in tissue distribution among FABP orthologs have resulted in the implementation of numeric nomenclature, such that FABP1 corresponds to L-FABP, FABP2 to I-FABP, FABP3 to H-FABP, FABP4 to A-FABP, and FABP5 to E-FABP [9, 11].

FABPs bind a single ligand molecule [12], with the exception of FABP1 and FABP10, both L-FABPs capable of simultaneously binding two ligand molecules [13]. FABP1 was the first FABP isolated from liver [14], and functions in fatty acid uptake [15] and metabolic pathway allocation in vertebrates [16], lipoprotein production [17], and nuclear delivery of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) ligands that results in the modulation of targeted gene expression [18]. FABP10 was first isolated from chicken liver [13], and is more similar in sequence to ileal FABPs than mammalian FABP1. To date, the FABP10 gene and protein have only been identified in nonmammalian vertebrates [8].

While FABPs among vertebrates have been studied in detail for more than three decades, with more than 400 identified, only ≈40 FABPs have yet been identified in invertebrates [1, 9] and no information concerning FABP is available for Brachyura. The Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis), a commercially important species in South-East Asia, is widely farmed in China and has quickly become an important aquaculture species [19] that has been cultured in ponds, reservoirs and lakes since the 1990's [20]. Hepatopancreas is generally regarded as a major lipid storage organ analogous to the fat body in insects and adipose tissue and liver in vertebrates [21]. The hepatopancreas in crab is a midgut diverticulum involved in the synthesis and secretion of digestive enzymes, final food digestion, nutrient absorption, and lipid and carbohydrate metabolism [22]; further, it is also a sensitive indicator of lipid metabolism and nutritional status [23]. Previous studies have shown that energy stored in crab hepatopancreas is in preparation for the significant expenditure required during the early stages of reproduction [24]. In order to elucidate potential functions of the hepatopancreas during reproduction in E. sinensis, a nonnormalized hepatopancreatic cDNA library was constructed [25]. EST analysis and subsequent cloning revealed an Es-FABP unigene, the first FABP gene identified in Brachyura. In the present study, we isolated FABP, for the first time from hepatopancreas of the Chinese mitten crab, investigated seasonal expression with respect to reproductive stage, and explored the relationship between FABP expression level and ovary development in the Chinese mitten crab in order to provide further insights into reproduction, nutrition and development of the Chinese mitten crab for farming industry.


Tissues preparation

Healthy adult female crabs (E. sinensis) were purchased from Tongchuan aquatic product market, Shanghai, China. Crabs were placed in an ice-bath for 1-2 min until lightly anesthetized. Eleven tissues were collected, including hepatopancreas, gills, stomach, intestine, cranial ganglia, thoracic ganglia, hemocyte, heart, muscle, and ovary, frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C until nucleic acid extraction.

Based on the ovarian classification of Xue et al [26], ovarian Stage III-1 (40-50 mm diameter), III-2 (60-90 mm diameter), and IV (92-100 mm diameter) specimens were collected from August to September, September to November, and December to March, respectively, for ovarian Es-FABP expression analysis. For the present study, ovarian stages were further sub-divided based upon the month of dissection: Stage III-1 (Aug), Stage III-1 (Sep); Stage III-2 (Sep), Stage III-2 (Oct), Stage III-2 (Nov); Stage IV (Jan). Collection of hepatopancreas and hemocyte specimens occurred concomitantly with ovarian staged specimens. Tissues were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until RNA extraction.

Nucleic acid extraction

RNA was extracted using a RNA Extraction Kit (Axygen, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA concentration and quality were estimated by spectrophotometry at an absorbance of 260 nm, (Eppendorf Biophotometer plus, Germany) and agarose gel electrophoresis (Bio-Rad PowerPacBasic, USA), respectively. Total RNA (200 ng) was reverse transcribed using the PrimeScript™ RT-PCR Kit (TaKaRa, Japan) for semi-quantitative RT-PCR or the SYBR PrimeScript™ RT-PCR Kit (TaKaRa, Japan) for real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR).

Chinese mitten crab genomic DNA was extracted from hepatopancreas using the Axyprep™ Multisource Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Axygen, USA) according to manufacturer's protocol. DNA concentration and quality was estimated by spectrophotometry at an absorbance of 260 nm (Eppendorf Biophotometer plus, Germany) and agarose gel electrophoresis (Bio-Rad PowerPacBasic, USA), respectively.

EST analysis and full-length cDNA cloning

A cDNA library was previously constructed from the hepatopancreas of Chinese mitten crab, and 3355 successful sequencing reactions were obtained using a T3 primer [25]. BLASTx analysis of EST sequences revealed 20 ESTs with high identity to FcFABP in Fenneropenaeus chinensis (ACU82845), which could be assembled into a single contig [a representative 527 bp EST is reported as GenBank: FG358115]. Sequence of the assembled Es-FABP contig was confirmed from the 3' direction using a T7 primer (Table 1).

Table 1 Oligonucleotide primers used to amplify the E. sinensis FABP gene

To verify cDNA sequence, a gene-specific primer pair, F-S2 (sense) and F-R2 (anti-sense) (Table 1), was designed by Primer Premier 5.0 based on the sequence of the assembled contig mentioned above. The PCR reaction was performed in a ABI 2720 Thermal Cycler in a total volume of 25 μl and contained 2.5 μl of 10 × PCR buffer (Mg2+ plus), 2.0 μl of dNTPs mix (2.5 mM each), 0.5 μl of each primer (20 μM), 18.375 μl of RNase-free water, 0.125 μl (5 U/μl) of Taq polymerase (TaKaRa, Japan), and 1 μl cDNA (500 ng/μl) as template. The PCR conditions were as follows: 94°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 58°C for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s; and 72°C for 10 min. Appropriately sized PCR products were gel-purified and ligated into a pGEM-T easy vector (Promega, USA) with T4 DNA ligase. Positive clones containing inserts of predicted size were sequenced using T7 and SP6 primers (Table 1).

Cloning of the Es-FABP gene and associated 5', 3'-flanking regions

The Es-FABP genomic DNA sequence was obtained with a gene-specific primer pair (F-S1, F-R1; Table 1), which corresponded to the cloned cDNA sequence. The final PCR reaction was performed in a total volume of 25 μl as described above. The 5'and 3'-flanking regions were cloned using a Genome Walking Kit (TaKaRa, Japan) according to the manufacturer's protocol with the following primers: 5'SP1, 5'SP2, 5'SP3, 3'SP1, 3'SP2, and 3'SP3. Specific products were purified and ligated into a pGEM-T easy vector (Promega, USA) with T4 DNA ligase. Positive clones were sequenced using SP6 primers (Table 1) and a 3730XL DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The positions of exons and introns were determined by spidey.

Phylogenetic analysis

Es-FABP nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences were compared to those reported for other organisms using the BLAST algorithm at the National Center for Biotechnology Information to assess sequence identity. FABP amino acid sequences from E. sinensis and representative taxa were retrieved from NCBI GenBank and analyzed using the ClustalW Multiple Alignment program The open reading frame (ORF) of the cloned Es-FABP cDNA was determined by the ORF Finder A neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree was constructed using the MEGA software version 4.0 package ( The confidence values for phylogeny analysis were determined by 1000 bootstrap replicates and expressed as a percentage. Three-dimensional domain structure of Es-FABP was predicted by Protein existence Server.

Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted and reverse transcribed as described above. A predicted FABP PCR amplicon of 500 bp was generated using the gene-specific primer pair F-R2 and F-S2 (Table 1). The constitutively expressed beta-actin (Actin-R and Actin-S) produced a 276 bp product and served as an internal control. FABP and beta-actin genes were run in two single PCR reaction, with same PCR conditions and cycle number. The PCR reaction was performed in a final volume of 25 μl and contained 2.5 μl 10 × PCR buffer (Mg2+ Plus), 2 μl 10 mM dNTP mixture, 0.25 μl 20 mM each primer, 18.875 μl PCR-Grade water, 0.125 μl 5 U Ex Taq™ Hot Start Version (TaKaRa, Japan), and 1 μl cDNA as template. PCR conditions were as follows: 94°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, 72°C for 1 min; and 72°C for 5 min. RT-PCR products were separated on 1.5% agarose gel with ethidium bromide and detected under a Gel Doc 2000 ultraviolet light (Tannon, China).

SYBR Green real-time qRT-PCR analysis

Real-time qRT-PCR was performed in a C1000™ Thermal Cycler (BioRad CFX 96™ Real-Time System) according to the manufacturer's instructions. PCR conditions were as follows: 95°C for 30 s; 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s, 60°C for 30 s, with an 0.1°C/s incremental increase from 60°C to 95°C. The final volume of each qRT-PCR reaction was 25.0 μl, and contained 12.5 μl 2 × SYBR Premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa, Japan), 0.5 μl diluted cDNA template, 11.0 μl PCR-Grade water, and 0.5 μl of each 20 uM primer (F-R3, F-S3 Table 1). Beta-actin fragments were amplified using the primer pair Actin-R and Actin-S, and served as a positive control. Samples were run in triplicate, and Es-FABP expression levels were calculated by the 2-ΔΔCt comparative CT method [27]. Data are represented as triplicate mean ± SD (standard deviation) and presented as the n-fold difference relative to beta-actin.

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance was determined by a one-way ANOVA and a posthoc Tukey test using SPSS 11.5 software. Significance was set at P < 0.05.


Cloning and identification of the Es-FABP cDNA

A full length FABP cDNA (Es-FABP) was isolated from the hepatopancreas of a female Chinese mitten crab [GenBank: GU568242]. The full length cDNA (750 bp) contained a 393 bp open reading frame (ORF), which encoded a putative 131 amino acid FABP protein, a 65 bp 5'-untranslated region (UTR), and a 282 bp 3'-UTR (Fig. 1). A single polyadenylation signal (AATAA) was observed 719 bp upstream of the 12 bp poly (A) tail. Analysis of the Es-FABP cDNA sequence using BLASTX revealed significant sequence similarity to other FABPs sequences included in the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (NCBI,

Figure 1
figure 1

Es-FABP nucleotide (above) and deduced amino acid (below) sequences. Nucleotides numbering was initiated at the first base pair at the 5' end. Amino acid numbering began with the first in-frame methionine. The stop codon is marked by an asterisk. The polyadenylation signal (AATAA) is enclosed by a black ellipse. The Es-FABP sequence was submitted to GenBank [GenBank: GU568242].

Genomic sequence and structure of Es-FABP

The Es-FABP gene was 9108 bp in length and was comprised of four exons interrupted by three introns (Fig. 2) [GenBank: GU568243]. Typical intron-exon junction structures with donor and acceptor (GT and AG) dinucleotide sequences were conserved in Es-FABP. Es-FABP genomic and cDNA sequences exhibited 99% similarity. The 1201 bp 5' anking upstream region contained a putative TATA box, but no binding motifs were identified. Comparison of the exon/intron organization of the FABP genes from Danio rerio (fabp10), Gallus gallus (fabp10), Ciona intestinalis (fabp10), Homo sapiens (fabp1), Mus musculus (fabp1) (Fig. 3). The positions of exons and introns were determined by an mRNA-to-genomic alignment using Spidey.

Figure 2
figure 2

Genomic organization and nucleotide sequence of Es-FABP. The coding sequence is in bold italics, and start and stop codons are shaded with "" indicate their position. Intron sequences are represented by a dotted line. Exon/intron splice junctions (gt/ag) are shadowed. The 5'flanking region of the Es-FABP gene is shown in capital letters, and a putative TATA box enclosed by a black rectangle. The polyadenylation signal sequence AATAA is indicated by a black straight line.

Figure 3
figure 3

The positions of exons and introns were determined by Spidey. Alignment shows the following sequences: Danio rerio (Drfabp10) [GenBank accession no: NC_007127]; Gallus gallus (Ggfabp10) [NC_006110]; Ciona intestinalis (Cifabp10) [LOC100183372]; Homo sapiens (Hsfabp1) [NC_000002]; Mus musculus (Mmfabp1) [NC_000072]. Exons (E1, E2, E3, E4) are shown as blocks and introns as lines. The length of each exon is shown above the blocks. The size of each exon and intron is approximately represented by the length of blocks and lines. Intron scale bar:1000 basepairs (1 kb).

Homology Analysis of Es-FABP

The identity of Es-FABP and other representative vertebrate and invertebrate deduced amino acid FABP sequences was explored via multiple sequence alignment using ClustalX (Fig. 4) [28]. Overall percent identify was high among Es-FABP and other reported invertebrate sequences, with 56% identity to Fenneropenaeus chinensis and 62% identity to Litopenaeus vannamei. Overall percent identity of Es-FABP and representative higher and lower vertebrates was substantially lower, with 21% identity to Ctenopharyngodon idella; 22% identity to Sparus aurata; 27% identity to Xenopus tropicalis; 28% identity to Rattus norvegicus; 29% identity to Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, Danio rerio, Taeniopygia guttata, Rana catesbeiana, Pongo abelii; 30% identity to Bos Taurus; 32% identity to Gallus gallus.

Figure 4
figure 4

ClustalX alignment of vertebrate and invertebrate FABP amino acid sequences. Alignment shows the following sequences: Mus musculus (M_musculus, FABP1) [GenBank: NP_059095]; Rattus norvegicus (R_norvegicus, FABP1) [NP_036688]; Homo sapiens (H_sapiens, FABP1) [NP_001434]; Pongo abelii (P_abelii, FABP1) [NP_001125017]; Bos Taurus (B_Taurus, FABP1) [NP_787011]; Gallus gallus (G_gallus, FABP1) [NP_989523]; Taeniopygia guttata (T_guttata, FABP1) [XP_002188068]; Xenopus tropicalis (X_tropicalis, FABP1) [NP_001116883]; Rana catesbeiana (R_catesbeiana, FABP1) [ACO51701]; Danio rerio (D_rerio, FABP1a) [NP_001038177]; Danio rerio (D_rerio, FABP1b) [NP_001019822]; Ctenopharyngodon idella (C_idella, FABP1) [ABW38784]; Fenneropenaeus chinensis (F_chinensis, FABP) [ACU82845]; Litopenaeus vannamei (L_vannamei, FABP10) [ABD65306]; Eriocheir sinensis (E_sinensis, FABP) [GU568242].

A NJ phylogenic tree was constructed based on reported FABPs amino acid sequences using MEGA4.0 software (Fig. 5). The reliability of the branching was tested using the bootstrap resampling (with 1000 pseudo replicates) technique. Two distinct sister groups were observed, with tree topology in agreement with traditional taxonomic relationships. The first group contained vertebrate FABP1, FABP6 and FABP10 sequences, as well as Es-FABP and shrimp FABPs. The second group contained vertebrate FABP2, FABP3, FABP4, FABP5, FABP7, FABP8, FABP9, FABP11, and FABP12 sequences.

Figure 5
figure 5

Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree of representative vertebrate and invertebrate FABP amino acid sequences. Bootstrap values supporting branch points are expressed as the percentage of 1000 replicates. The following organisms with FABP GenBank reported sequences were included in the analysis: A. mexicanum (Am-FABP10) [GenBank: P81400.2]; B. arenarum (Ba-FABO10) [P83409]; D. rerio (Dr-FABP1b) [AAZ08576], Dr-FABP1a [NP_001038177], Dr-FABP3 [NP_694493], Dr-FABP6 [ACD37360], Dr-FABP10 [AAI64928], Dr-FABP11 [NP_001004682]; F. chinensis (Fc-FABP) [ACU82845]; G. gallus (Gg-FABP1) [NP_989523], Gg-FABP4 [NP_989621]; H. sapiens (Hs-FABP1) [NP_001434], Hs-FABP4 [NM_001442], Hs-FABP5 [NP_001435], Hs-FABP6 [AAH22489], Hs-FABP7 [CAG33338], Hs-FABP8 [NP_002668], Hs-FABP9 [NP_001073995], Hs-FABP12 [NP_001098751]; L. vannamei (Lv-FABP10) [ABD65306]; M. musculus (Mm-FABP1) [NP_059095], Mm-FABP2 [AAS00550], Mm-FABP5 [NP_034764], Mm-FABP7 [CAJ18607], Mm-FABP9 [NP_035728], Mm-FABP2 [NP_083586]; O. mykiss (Om-FABP3) [NP_001118185]; P. abelii (Pa-FABP1) [NP_001125017]; R. norvegicus (Rn-FABP3) [NP_077076], Rn-FABP6 [NP_058794], Rn-FABP9 [NP_074045], Rn-FABP2 [NP_001128086]; R. sapo (Rs-FABP10) [P80856]; S. scrofa (Ss-FABP2) [NM_001031780], Ss-FABP4 [NM_001002817], Ss-FAPP5 [NP_001034835], Ss-FABP7 [AAY17257], Ss-FABP11 [CAM58515]; T. guttata (Tg-FABP1) [XP_002188068]; X. laevis (Xl-FABP2) [NM_001085877].

A homology model of Es-FABP was predicted in SWISS-MODEL database revealed conservation of tertiary structure, with the 10 anti-parallel β-strands forming a barrel and a clamshell-like structure.

Tissue distribution and reproductive dependence of Es-FABP expression

Semi-quantitative RT-PCR and real-time qRT-PCR were employed to investigate the distribution of Es-FABP mRNA in different tissues as well as to assess expression during the seasonal female reproductive cycle. As determined by RT-PCR, Es-FABP was widely distributed with high and detectable expression levels observed in hepatopancreas, ovary, hemocytes, and gills, muscle, cranial ganglia, thoracic ganglia, heart, intestine, respectively; while expression was nondetectable in stomach and eyestalk (Fig. 6).

Figure 6
figure 6

Tissue distribution of Es-FABP expression as determined by semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis. Es-FABP RT-PCR and beta-actin results are displayed in the upper and lower panels, respectively. Appropriately sized amplicons were observed in RNA extracts from E. sinensis hepatopancreas, hemocytes, ovary, muscle, gills, cranial ganglia, thoracic ganglia, heart, and intestine, while expression was nondetectable in stomach, eyestalk, and the negative control (no template).

As determined by real-time qRT-PCR, beta-actin normalized Es-FABP expression in ovary increased rapidly and significantly from Stage III-1 (Aug-Sep) to reach peak expression during Stage III-2 (Nov) (Fig. 7). Es-FABP ovarian expression then decreased significantly through Stage IV (Jan). Hepatopancreatic expression decreased gradually from Stage III-1 (Aug) to Stage III-2 (Nov) and then increased significantly in Stage IV (Jan) (Fig. 8). Es-FABP expression in hemocytes did not differ significantly from Stage III-1 (Aug) through Stage III-2 (Nov), with a sharp peak observed during Stage IV (Jan) (Fig. 9).

Figure 7
figure 7

Ovarian Es-FABP expression was influenced by the period of reproductive activity, as determined by real-time qRT-PCR. Es-FABP expression, normalized to beta-actin, was quantified in mitten crab ovaries collected during the stages of rapid ovarian maturation: Stage III-1(Aug), Stage III-1(Sep), Stage III-2 (Sep), Stage III-2 (Oct), Stage III-2 (Nov), and Stage IV (Jan). Bars represent the triplicate mean ± S.E. from three individuals (n = 3). Bars with different letters differed significantly (P < 0.05).

Figure 8
figure 8

Hepatopancreatic Es-FABP expression was influenced by the period of reproductive activity, as determined by real-time qRT-PCR. Es-FABP expression, normalized to beta-actin, was quantified in mitten crab ovaries collected during the stages of rapid ovarian maturation: Stage III-1(Aug), Stage III-1(Sep), Stage III-2 (Sep), Stage III-2 (Oct), Stage III-2 (Nov), and Stage IV (Jan). Bars represent the triplicate mean ± S.E. from three individuals (n = 3). Bars with different letters differed significantly (P < 0.05).

Figure 9
figure 9

Hemocytes Es-FABP expression was influenced by the period of reproductive activity, as determined by real-time qRT-PCR. Es-FABP expression, normalized to beta-actin, was quantified in mitten crab ovaries collected during the stages of rapid ovarian maturation: Stage III-1(Aug), Stage III-1(Sep), Stage III-2 (Sep), Stage III-2 (Oct), Stage III-2 (Nov), and Stage IV (Jan). Bars represent the triplicate mean ± S.E. from three individuals (n = 3). Bars with different letters differed significantly (P < 0.05).


FABP gene family members are evolutionarily conserved, with extensive and interdependent functions in the regulation of fatty acid oxidation/metabolism [9]. Although much research has focused on the classification, structure and function of vertebrate FABPs, these proteins remain unidentified in many invertebrate species. The current study reports the cloning and gene structure of a FABP family member in E. sinensis, Es-FABP, and presents evidence of functionality in fatty acid metabolism.

The full-length Es-FABP cDNA reported in the present paper encoded a putative FABP protein of 131 amino acids, which falls within the size range of other reported FABPs (127-136 amino acids) [29]. The ClustalX alignment of Es-FABP and fourteen other reported vertebrate and invertebrate FABP sequences revealed high identity among invertebrate sequences (56-62%) although percent identity remained lower when comparing within invertebrate and mammalian taxa (79-90%) [9]. Three-dimensional homology modeling revealed that several key tertiary structures of Es-FABP were similar to those of vertebrate FABP, such as the 10 anti-parallel β-strands, their resultant barrel with a clamshell-like structure, and the barrel cap comprised of a pair of α-helices, which enclose the FABP lipid-binding site cavity [30].

The cloned Es-FABP gene was 9108 bp in length, and was comprised of four exons interrupted by three introns, a conserved genomic organization among both species [31, 32] and FABP superfamily members. Comparison of the exon/intron organization of the FABP genes revealed that, the genes are organized in four exons and three introns located in conserved positions, although varying markedly in size. And the second intron of Es-FABP was substantially longer than reported for other species. In general, while large introns are not unusual in organisms with very large genomes, they are less common among heavily transcribed genes, like the locust FABP[7]. Long introns might be favored because they enhance recombination, thus introducing mutations in adjacent exons [33] or intra- and inter- gene recombination [34], all of which would be subjected to selection pressures.

Phylogenetic analysis revealed two distinct sister groups within our constructed NJ tree as previously reported [8, 35]: (1) group 1 contained FABP1, 6, 10, and (2) group 2 contained FABP2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12. Schaap et. al. estimated that FABP1, FABP6 and FABP10 diverged from a common ancestral gene ~679 million years ago (mya) [6]. FABP6 is an ileal-type FABP [36], while FABP1 and FABP10 are paralogs, and are thus evolutionarily related liver-type FABPs, which possibly arose by a gene duplication event [8]. Es-FABP segregated within group 1, clustering in close proximity to Fc-FABP10 and LvFABP10. ClustalX alignment results suggest that Es-FABP shares a high percent identity with FABP10. Based on collective phylogenetic evidence, we hypothesize that the Es-FABP we cloned from hepatopancreas is a FABP10.

We hypothesized that Es-FABP tissue expression profiles may provide useful cues when speculating gene function. In the present study, Es-FABP transcripts were primarily detected in hepatopancreas, hemocytes, and ovary. The hepatopancreas is generally regarded as a major storage organ of lipids, which are transported to reproductive organs and tissues during a period of reproductive activity [24]. Interestingly, the crustacean ovary contains a high lipid content compared to other organs [37, 38], which is a key nutrient required for ovarian development and appropriate egg hatching rate and larval survival [3841]. Further, the crustacean ovary is rich in long-chain poly unsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) [42]. As intracellular transporters of PUFA, FABP may serve as mediators of their physiological function, availability and access to intracellular targeted systems [10]. The high Es-FABP expression levels observed in these organs suggest that lipid nutrients, especially fatty acids, are transported from the hepatopancreas to the ovary in great supply via Es-FABP expressing hemocytes during the stage of rapid ovarian development. Es-FABP transported lipids are then stored in the ovaries in preparation for the significant and impendent energy expenditure required during reproduction [21].

Real-time qRT-PCR analysis revealed Es-FABP expression levels were dependent on the stage of ovarian development in all three organs. Fatty acids (FA) in general, including the ubiquitous palmitic and oleic acids, can regulate gene expression at the transcriptional level [43, 44]. Furthermore, long-chain FA and long-chain dicarboxylic acids can act as inducers of FABP1 expression [45, 46], as tissue FABP content is related to the rate of FA uptake and/or utilization [4749]. Similarly, manipulations altering the rate of tissue FA metabolism appear to be associated with concomitant changes in FABP content [50]. Therefore, a direct or indirect feedback loop between FA and FABP may exist. In the present study, ovarian Es-FABP expression increased with the developmental progression of the ovary, mirroring lipid nutritional requirements. The ovary requires substantial accumulation of lipids, especially fatty acids, during developmental stages [5153]. Interestingly, the rapid increase in ovarian lipid deposition was associated with a gradual decline in Es-FABP expression in hepatopancreas, suggesting hepatopancreas-mediated lipid transport may be occurring during ovarian development. Determining the existence or absence of a hepatopancreas-ovary feedback loop requires further study.


In conclusion, evidence provided in the present report supports a role of Es-FABP in lipid transport during the period of rapid ovarian growth in E. sinensis, and indirectly confirms the participation of the hepatopancreas, ovary, and hemocytes in lipid nutrient absorption and utilization processes. However, further study concerning Es-FABP's specific mechanistic role in the process of lipid transport is both required and warranted.


  1. 1.

    Esteves A, Ehrlich R: Invertebrate intracellular fatty acid binding proteins. Comp Biochem Physiol C. 2006, 2: 262-74.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Corsico B, Liou HL, Storch J: The alphahelical domain of liver fatty acid binding proteinis responsible for the diffusion-mediated transfer of fatty acids to phospholipid membranes. Biochemistry. 2004, 43: 3600-3607. 10.1021/bi0357356

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ho SY, Delgado L, Storch J: Monoacylglycerol metabolism in human intestinal Caco-2 cells: evidence for metabolic compartmentation and hydrolysis. Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 1816-1823. 10.1074/jbc.M108027200.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Storch J, Veerkamp JH, Hsu KT: Similar mechanisms of fatty acid transfer from human and roden fatty acid-binding proteins to membranes: liver, intestine, heart muscle and adipose tissue FABPs. Mol Cell Biochem. 2002, 239: 25-33. 10.1023/A:1020546321508

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bernlohr DA, Simpson MA, Hertzel AV, Banaszak LJ: Intracellular lipid-binding proteins and their genes. Annu Rev Nutr. 1997, 17: 277-303. 10.1146/annurev.nutr.17.1.277

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Schaap FG, Vusse GJ, Glatz JF: Evolution of the family of intracellular lipid binding proteins in vertebrates. Mol Cell Biochem. 2002, 239: 69-77. 10.1023/A:1020519011939

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wu QW, Andolfatto P: Cloning and sequence of the gene encoding the muscle fatty acid binding protein from the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. Ins Biochem Mol Biol. 2001, 31: 553-562. 10.1016/S0965-1748(00)00158-2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Sharma MK, Liu RZ, Thisse C, Thisse B: Hierarchical subfunctionalization of FABP1a, FABP1b and FABP10 tissue-specific expression may account for retention of these duplicated genes in the zebrafish (Danio rerio) genome. FEBS J. 2006, 273: 3216-3229. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05330.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zimmerman AW, Veerkamp JH: New insights into the structure and function of fatty acid-binding proteins. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2002, 11: 1096-1116. 10.1007/s00018-002-8490-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Liu RZ, Li X, Godbout R: A novel fatty acid-binding protein (FABP) gene resulting from tandem geneduplication in mammals: transcription in rat retina and testis. Genomics. 2008, 92: 436-445. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2008.08.003

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hertzel AV, Bernlohr DA: The mammalian fatty acid-binding protein multigene family: molecular and genetic insights into function. Trends Endocrine Metab. 2000, 11: 175-180. 10.1016/S1043-2760(00)00257-5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nichesola D, Perduca M, Capaldi S, Carriso ME, Righetti PG, Monaco HL: Crystal structure of chicken liver basic fatty acid-binding protein complexed with cholic acid. Biochemistry. 2004, 43: 14072-14079. 10.1021/bi0489661

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ceciliani F, Monaco HL, Ronchi S, Faotto L, Spadon P: The primary structure of a basic (pI 9.0) fatty acid-binding protein from liver of Gallus domesticus. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 1994, 109: 261-71. 10.1016/0305-0491(94)90010-8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Schleicher CH, Santome JA: Purification, characterization, and partia lamino acid sequencing of an amphibian liver fatty acid binding protein. Biochem Cell Biol. 1996, 74: 109-115. 10.1139/o96-012

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Newberry EP, Xie Y, Kennedy S, Han X, Buhman KK, Luo J, Gross RW, Davidson NO: Decreased hepatic triglyceride accumulation and altered fatty acid uptake in mice with deletion of the liver fatty acid-binding protein gene. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 51664-51672. 10.1074/jbc.M309377200

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Storch J, Corsico B: The Emerging Functions and Mechanisms of Mammalian Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins. Annu Rev Nutr. 2008, 28: 73-95. 10.1146/annurev.nutr.27.061406.093710

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Spann NJ, Kang S, Li AC, Chen AZ, Newberry EP, Davidson NO, Hui STY, Davis RA: Coordinate transcriptional repression of liver fatty acid-binding protein and microsomal triglyceride transfer protein blocks hepatic very low density lipoprotein secretion without hepatosteatosis. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 33066-33077. 10.1074/jbc.M607148200

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wolfrum C, Borrmann CM, Börchers T, Spener F: Fatty acids and hypolipidemic drugs regulate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors α-and γ-mediated gene expression via liver fatty acid binding protein: A signaling path to the nucleus. Biol Sci Biochem. 2001, 98: 2323-2328.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yang WL, Zhang GH: Current trends of aquaculture roduction and sustainable development of Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis. Chin J Freshwater Fish. 2005, 35: 62-64.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chen DW, Zhang M, Shrestha S: Compositional characteristics and nutritional qualitity of Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis). Food Chem. 2007, 103: 1343-1349. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.10.047.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wen XB, Chen LQ, Ai CX, Zhou ZL, Jiang HB: Variation in lipid composition of Chinese mitten-handed crab, Eriocheir sinensis during ovarian maturation. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 2001, 130: 95-104. 10.1016/S1096-4959(01)00411-0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Verri T, Mandal A, Zilli L, Bossa D, Mandal PK, Ingrosso L, Zonno V, Vilella S, Ahearn GA, Storelli C: D-glucose transport in decapod crustacean hepatopancreas. Comp Biochem Physiol A. 2001, 130: 585-606.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Li E, Chen L, Zeng C, Yu N, Xiong Z, Chen X, Qin JG: Comparison of digestive and antioxidant enzymes activities, haemolymph oxyhemocyanin contents and hepatopancreas histology of white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, at various salinities. Aquaculture. 2008, 274: 80-86. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.11.001.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Normant M, Chrobak M, Szaniawska A: Energy value and chemical composition (CHN) of the Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis (Decapoda: Grapsidae) from the Baltic Sea. Thermochimica Acta. 2002, 394: 233-237. 10.1016/S0040-6031(02)00259-9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Jiang H, Cai YM, Chen LQ, Zhang XW, Hu SN, Wang Q: Functional annotation and analysis of expressed sequence tags from the hepatopancreas of mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis). Mar Biotechnol. 2009, 11: 317-326. 10.1007/s10126-008-9146-1

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Xue LZ, Du NS, Lai W: Histology of female reproductive system in Chinese mitten-handed crab, Eriocheir sinensis (Crustacean, Dacapoda). J East China Norm Univ Nat Sci Ed. 1987, 3: 88-97.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 (-Delta Delta C (T) ) Method. Methods. 2001, 25: 402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Thompson JD, Higgins DJ, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl Acids Res. 1994, 22: 4673-4680. 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chen ZH, Xu LM, Shan AS: Fatty acid- binding proteins (FABPs) and their genes of FABPs. J NE Agr Univ. 2006, 5: 689-692.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chmurzynska A: The multigene family of fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs): function, structure, and polymorphism. J Appl Genet. 2006, 47: 39-48. 10.1007/BF03194597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Haunerland NH: Fatty acid binding proteins in locust and mammalian muscle. Comparison of structure, function, and regulation. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 1994, 109: 199-208. 10.1016/0305-0491(94)90003-5

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Veerkamp JH, Maatman R: Cytoplasmic fatty acid-binding proteins: their structure and genes. Prog Lipid Res. 1995, 34: 17-52. 10.1016/0163-7827(94)00005-7

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Comeron JM, Kreitman M: The correlation between intron length and recombination in Drosophila. Dynamic equilibrium between mutational and selective forces. Genetics. 2000, 156: 1175-1190.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Duret L: Why Do Genes Have Introns? Recombination Might Add a New Piece to the Puzzle. Trends Genet. 2001, 17: 172-175. 10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02236-3

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ananda BV, Christine T, Bernard T, Jonathan MW: Differential tissue-specific distribution of transcripts for the duplicated fatty acid-binding protein 10 (FABP10) genes in embryos, larvae and adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). FEBS J. 2009, 276: 6787-6797. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07393.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Schleicher CH, Cordoba OL, Santome JA: Molecular evolution of the multigene family of intracellular lipid-binding proteins. Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1995, 36: 1117-1125.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ando T, Kanazawa A, Teshima S: Variation in the lipids of tissues during the molting cycle of prawn. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish. 1977, 43: 1445-1449.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Teshima S, Kanazawa A: Variation in lipid compositions during the ovarian maturation of the prawn. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish. 1983, 49: 957-962. 10.1246/bcsj.49.957.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Xu XL, Ji WJ, Castell JD: Essential fatty acid requirement of the Chinese prawn, Penaeus chinensis. Aquaculture. 1994, 127: 29-40. 10.1016/0044-8486(94)90189-9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lautier J, Lagarrigue JG: Lipid metabolism of the crab Pachyrapsus marmoratus during vitellogenesis. Biochem Syst Ecol. 1998, 16: 203-212. 10.1016/0305-1978(88)90098-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Alava VR, Kanazawa A, Teshima S, Koshio S: Effects of dietary phospholipids and ω3-high unsaturated fatty acid on ovarian development of kuruna prawn. Nippon Suisan Gakk. 1993, 59: 345-351.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    San GJP, Chew EY: The role of omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in health and disease of the retina. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005, 24: 87-138. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Distel RJ, Robinson GS, Spiegelman BM: Fatty acid regulation of gene expression. Transcriptinal and post-transcriptional mechanism. Biol Chem. 1992, 267: 5937-5941.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Clarke SD, Jump DB: Regulation of gene transcription by polyunsaturated fatty acids. Prog Lipid Res. 1993, 32: 139-149. 10.1016/0163-7827(93)90013-M

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kaikaus RM, Chan WK, Montellano PRo, Bass NM: Mechanisms of regulation of liver fatty acid-binding protein. Mol Cell Biochem. 1993, 123: 93-100. 10.1007/BF01076479

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Kaikaus RM, Sui Z, Lysensko N: Regulation of pathways of extramitochondrial fatty acid oxidation and liver fatty acid-binding protein by long-chain monocarboxylic fatty acids in hepatocytes. Biol Chem. 1993, 268: 26866-26871.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Glatz JFC, Vusse GJ: Cellular fatty acid-binding proteins: current concepts and future directions. Molec Cell Biochem. 1990, 98: 237-251.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Ockner RK, Lysenko N, Manning JA, Monroe SE, Barnett DA: Sex steroid modulation of fatty acid utilization and fatty acid binding protein concentration in rat liver. Clin Invest. 1980, 65: 1013-1023. 10.1172/JCI109753.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Breda E, Keizer HA, Vork MM, Jong YF, Vusse GJ, Glatz JFC: Modulation of fatty acid-binding protein content of rat heart and skeletal muscle by endurance training and testosterone treatment. Eur J Phys. 1992, 421: 274-279. 10.1007/BF00374838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Glatz JFC, Borchers T, Spener F, Vusse GJ: Fatty Acids in Cell Signalling: Modulation by Lipid Binding Proteins. Prostag Leukotr Ess. 1995, 52: 121-127. 10.1016/0952-3278(95)90010-1.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Gonzalen-Baro MR, Pollero RJ: Lipid characterization and distri bution a mong tissues of the freshwater crustacean Macrobrachium borellii during and annual cycle. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 1988, 91: 711-715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Millanena OM: Effect of fatty acid composition broodstock diet on tissue fatty acid patterns and egg fertilization and hatching in pond reared Penaeus monodon. Asian Fish. 1989, 2: 127-131.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Mourente G, Medina A, Gonzalez S: Changes in lipid class and fatty acids contents in the ovary and midgut gland of the female fiddler crab Uca tangeri (Decapoda, Ocypodiadae) during maturation. Mar Biol. 1994, 121: 187-197. 10.1007/BF00349488.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 30671607, 30972241), program of Shanghai Education Commission (No. 08SG24).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qun Wang.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

YNG carried out the molecular studies, participated in the gene cloning, sequence alignment and drafted the manuscript. WWL participated in the phylogenetic analysis, semi-quantitative RT-PCR and SYBR Green real-time qRT-PCR analysis. JLS participated in the tissue preparation. FR participated in the nucleic acid extraction. LH participated in the statistical analysis. HJ provided EST sequences. QW conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ya-Nan Gong, Wei-Wei Li contributed equally to this work.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gong, YN., Li, WW., Sun, JL. et al. Molecular cloning and tissue expression of the fatty acid-binding protein (Es-FABP) gene in female Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis). BMC Molecular Biol 11, 71 (2010).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Hemocyte
  • Ovarian Development
  • Thoracic Ganglion
  • Chinese Mitten Crab
  • FABP Gene